Hittites in the House of David (No. 067C)

In researching the aspects of the history of nations it became evident just how important the DNA structure was to the identity of the nations and their distribution and interrelationship.

The basic outline was written to explain the structure from one man Adam and one woman Eve and where the offspring developed and dispersed. That paper is The Genetic Origin of the Nations (No. 265).

The sons of Noah were outlined in their respective branches of Shem, Ham and Japheth. The Bible story fits perfectly into the YDNA structure and explains perfectly the spread of humans and their origin. In fact it makes a complete nonsense of the Theory of Evolution once the correct time frames of the mutations are taken into account.

It is those mutations that in fact become obvious and relevant to understanding the YDNA mutations in the House of David. That DNA includes what is in fact Hittite YDNA that merged into the Davidic lineage in the Tenth century BCE.

When the writer was researching his YDNA some strange things happened with the results. There were a series of two, three and four step mutations that occurred that spread over both Europe and Asia and the Middle East. The first 12 sections were tested and led to a broad spectrum match with a number of groups of people. What was of interest was the number of three step mutation matches with Levites among Russian and Lithuanian Jews extending from Haplogroup (Hg.) R1b even into Haplogroup (Hg.) N in Lithuania.

What was to prove somewhat enigmatic was a three-step match with a Palestinian of Hg. RxR1 basic. This match was to prove relevant to later finds.

There were mutational matches also as far as Siberia and into Spain with a family also in Cuba, probably coming from Spain.

These finds were somewhat at odds with the fact that my YDNA was a known sub group of the Norse Celt range and extended all over Britain into the Scottish Isles of the Shetlands and the Orkneys and into Denmark Iceland and, strangely enough, into the European admixture of the Greenland Eskimos.

The explanation of that is fairly easy and of itself solved a long standing riddle of the Norse. We knew that at the early part of the Mediaeval Warm Period Greenland became ice free in summer and could be farmed. This view was put to the test when Eric the Red became involved in heated discussion in a banquet in Thule (now Iceland) in 996 and killed another and more powerful Thane. He took the road of discretion and loaded up the family and rowed to Greenland. The family settled it for the next 450 years and went on to colonise the northern areas of North America. It was thought that the Eskimos had wiped them out as it became colder in the recent Ice Age from 1450-1760 CE. From the DNA tests it appears that the family had not been wiped out at all. They simply joined the Eskimos and adapted to the colder conditions and are still there to this day.

The standard Evolutionary explanation of the Norse Celts is that they came in from the Middle East tens of thousands of years ago and settled North West Europe with a group also in what is Eastern Germany.

The problem is that that does not fit with what is known of British history and the ancient records.

The historical records show that the early inhabitants of Britain were a group of Magogites that came in from what is now the area of the Black Sea and who were termed Scythians. The original Irish were also described as coming in from that region of Greece/Thrace and Scythia. These people in Britain were subjugated by a group of Hittites from the kingdom of Wilusia, according to the early British Historians. Their capital at Troy was destroyed by the Hellenic alliance in the Trojan War. Troy fell in the year 1054 BCE, which was the last two years of the rule of Eli as judge in Israel, and the Irish histories denote this fact (see MacGeoghegan-Mitchell, The History of Ireland, Sadlier & Co., 1868, Chapters 2ff.).

This was the beginning of the destruction of the Hittite Empire which continued on until the Assyrians had eradicated them as the Hittite Empire and assumed their place.

In Britain these people assumed control from the Tenth century BCE. They repelled an invasion by the Huns in the Tenth century under the Hun king Humber who was defeated and killed at the Humber River named after him. The Hittite Trojan Cymry continued in control for the next fourteen hundred years with conflict between them and the Picts in the North until the Anglo-Saxons came into Britain following the Jutes after the retirement of the Romans. For many centuries they traded with the Middle East and the Phoenicians and from them they received exposure to Judah and its merchants.

It is from this lineage that we see some very interesting developments. It is also probably the origin of the similar YDNA structure that we were to find among some Middle East people in some surprising places.

An example of this was the sequence of testing to determine the origins of the YDNA of the Cox family of Surrey that was to lead to a very interesting development.

The initial testing graded the lineage as Norse Celts at R1b1c which was later rearranged in the R1b Haplogroup structure as R1b1b and then with further testing to R1b1b2a1a4 from the 67 DYS sequence to the U106 group positive at the L48.

Contact with others in this group saw the assertion made that the YDNA link was of the House of David in Judah and many of the group were Jews from Israel and from Spain.

This of course was understood to be impossible. However, the contact alleged that to be true. These lineages were stated to be demonstrable genealogically.

This view coincided with those expressed by another earlier match with an old British family who claimed that they were Sephardi Jews persecuted in the 1205 persecutions in Britain and driven underground.

This investigation was to lead to some startling findings in relation to the House of David and its YDNA structure.

Hg. R in the House of David

Most people who know anything about YDNA will agree that Hg. R is a non-Semitic YDNA and stems in biblical terms from the sons of Japheth. It is without doubt concentrated in the North of Europe and Asia and is related also to the Hg. Q Amerindians that also stemmed from the Hg. P ancestor which in turn is descended from the Hg. K ancestral link, which is linked to the Phoenicians and separate from the Hg. I and J ancestral Hebrew links. If David was anything he would have been an IJ Hebrew.

On being confronted with the amazing contentions of these Jews that claimed lineage from David yet were the U106 group linked to the R1b sub structure further research yielded the most amazing finds.

It was shown that at least two major lines of the house of David were in fact Hg. R. Most were R1b but one was in fact R1a and all were stated to be mutated significantly from one another.

Such a discovery makes a complete nonsense of the theory of Evolution and destroys the premises of the time frames of YDNA mutation.

For these people to be related from a single ancestor they had to be descended from an RxR1 basic ancestor that married into the Davidic Royal line and be absorbed into the genealogical structure just after David. In other words they had to have married one of David’s daughters or female line. This is quite possible genealogically as the genealogies in Judah do not mention females and the lines take the husband’s name even if a descent is taken in the female line. Only rarely are females mentioned. This fact is evidenced by the genealogy in Luke chapter 3 which ends with Joseph son of Heli but is widely known and acknowledged by Judah that the lineage in Luke 3 is that of Mariam the mother of Christ and the genealogy in Matthew chapter 1 is that of Joseph through Jeconiah or Coniah.

What has happened is that two of the major lines in the Royal House of David in Judah are descended from Celts who could only have come in to Judah in prominence after the fall of the Hittite empire in the north and this had to have been subsequent to the fall of Troy in 1054 BCE. There is only one Hittite famous enough and powerful enough to have entered the family of David and indeed David forced that situation himself.

The man was one of the Thirty of Israel and David had him killed to take his wife. That man was Uriah the Hittite and his wife was Bathsheba the mother of Solomon.

The Bible is silent on the matter of Bathsheba having a son or sons previously and she is simply presented as losing the first child to David and then bearing Solomon. However the law of God speaks volumes regarding the requirement for Uriah to have had the opportunity to produce offspring by his wife before he was employed in battle. That he had done so is also evidenced by the fact that he was not concerned to do so when he returned to Jerusalem. He did not cohabit with Bathsheba when it was in fact desired and planned that he have the opportunity to do so.

That Bathsheba had the opportunity to marry her son into the House of David is beyond dispute. She was the favourite wife of the king and the mother of the king designate, namely Solomon, and all Israel knew it. The best way for her to place her son by Uriah into the Royal House was by having him marry one of David’s daughters by another wife and there is no question of incest involved.

It therefore follows as a matter of logic that such a union would have produced Hittite Hg. R YDNA into the genealogy of David.

For the presence of R1b and also a small amount of R1a YDNA it has to be assumed that the original YDNA had to be RxR1 Basic. Thus after 900 BCE the YDNA split into R1B and then further mutated into an R1a offshoot. The fact that such YDNA is found in the most powerful Davidic clans in Judah is evidence of this scenario.

It is therefore a matter of fact that this YDNA is of itself a marker of the Hittite lines in the Royal House of David through one of David’s daughters. It is a most powerful argument that the royal line of David was extended to the gentiles and that salvation was and is of the Gentiles and that this line is of the line of David and Uriah the Hittite through Bathsheba. It is unlikely to have been by a marriage with Solomon’s daughters, as that was prohibited by biblical law.

That line of R1b YDNA is now amongst the Britons. The fact is further attested by the genealogical understanding that a major element of this YDNA is derived from the family name or word meaning son of Isaac (i.e. Cox). Other families are linked to this YDNA in England and also in Spain and elsewhere.

This same YDNA extends to Scotland and into the Shetlands, and to Iceland and to Denmark. It is widely dispersed.

The tendency is to sit on the discovery rather than offend the scientists with their pet theories based on evolutionary theory and mutation cycles or the families involved. It is far too important a discovery to allow that to happen.

The House of David among the British and its impact on the Celtic Church

Another ancestor was called Bran the Blessed. He was asserted by the historians/genealogists to be the son-in-law of Joseph of Aramathaea, and his wife Anna was asserted to be the cousin of the Virgin Mariam and one of the Desposyni. Thus all this family and their offspring are Desposyni or the Family of Jesus Christ. The mention by Geoffrey of Monmouth that Marius, alleged son of Arviragus, married the daughter of Bran the Blessed is a confusion of name as Marius was the Latinised form of Arviragus in its short form Meurig. It was Arviragus snr. that married the daughter of Bran the Blessed. Geoffrey says he lived in Rome for a time. Their son Coel married the daughter of Cyllin, son of Caradog, his second cousin. That is also our family line. The problem is discussed in Mike Ashley, Mammoth Book of British Kings and Queens, Carroll and Graf, 1999, p. 78).

Caradog was a Briton of the Cantii (40 CE), the Catuvellauni and Silures (43-51) that fought the Romans. He was first defeated in Kent. His son or brother (or perhaps son/nephew) Togodumnos was killed at the head of a second army somewhere in Hampshire. Togodumnos is thought to have been the Chief of the Dumnoniae of Devon and Cornwall (i.e. Tog y Dymnaint whose real name may have been Guiderius, although it is suggested as Arviragus the elder also).

The Emperor Claudius, with the army under Aulus Plautius, captured Caradog and Arviragus after the great defeat in Wales, and his betrayal by Cartimandua of the Magogite Brigantes of what is now Lancashire. Claudius took the whole family in chains to Rome. Caradog literally talked his way out of being executed (strangled after a Roman Triumph) and was spared along with the family. He and the whole family were baptised under the Apostle Paul. His son Linus seems to have already been baptised by the Apostles and, according to Hippolytus, Linus was appointed one of the Seventy. He became the first bishop of Rome (see the paper Origin of the Christian Church in Britain (No. 266)). He would thus have gone to Canaan with the father of his aunt Anna, namely Joseph, at the time of Christ. Joseph was understood to be a trader in metals with Britain.

After Caradog (or lat. Caratacus) died, reportedly poisoned at the same time as Claudius in 54 CE, Cyllin and Coel, his son-in-law and family, returned to Britain to take up the work commenced by Aristobulus, bishop of Britain and one of the Seventy (this group of the Seventy being sent out from Rome). The family became subjects, or client leaders in Britain, of the Romans and were able to consolidate the Church. Linus was martyred in Rome along with many of the early Church.

So, we can deduce that even though Caradog and the Britons did not want the Romans there and many died to prevent it, the opportunity was used by God to further establish the Church in Britain and northern Gaul. Paul was able to use Caradog’s family, including that of Arviragus, to establish the Church both in Rome and in Britain. Rome was used to consolidate Britain and prepare it for the years ahead where the Reformation would occur and then later the message of the Last Days would be promulgated from its people who were to be spread worldwide. The Celts were able to withstand the paganism of Rome and remain free Christians for centuries.

The Church established Sabbatarian Christianity in Britain and planted it in France against great opposition.

This history was well known but the Trinitarians from Rome went to great lengths to disguise and corrupt the stories and to discredit their veracity after 664 CE when their doctrines were forced on Britain at the point of a sword. There will be one final attempt to destroy God’s people but it will fail (for the previous attempts see also the paper The Virgin Mariam and the Family of Jesus Christ (No. 232)).

The Extent of the Lineage in Britain

To give an idea of the extent of the Family of Christ in Britain and the Commonwealth the following lineage will demonstrate the extent of the dispersion.

The lineage is son of Ewart William, s. of William Charles, s. of Thomas (Thomas William Martyn Cox of Surrey and Sydney) s. of Thomas Joseph Cox of Surrey m. Emma Martyn Stocker d. of William Martyn Stocker, son of Joseph Stocker and Mary Martyn of Broadclyst in Devon. The Stockers of Broadclyst came there from Winchester and their line goes back to a Thane in the court of Alfred the Great. They too were an ancient British family that shared in this heritage. Winchester was the capital in ancient times.

Mary Martyn wife of Joseph Stocker was the daughter of William Martyn of Broadclyst. The name William Martyn became a genealogical marker to the family and we will now stay with this line for the next eight centuries until we leave the Norman Conquests and go into Wales and the ancient British lineages. Some of the offshoots will be mentioned because they indicate the extent of the reach of the bloodlines and their diversity.

William was the son of Anthony Martyn and Elizabeth Voysey of Broadclyst. The Voyseys are the offshoots of the baronial house of Vesci. Voysey is the Devonian (Dumnonian) rendering of the name Vesci. They were clerks of the parish of Broadclyst for over two hundred years, commencing with Clement Voysey, when the parish records were first opened. Their line also married into the Veales of Cornwall descended from William Veale cousin of Christopher from the Gloucester Veales and also the Tuckers. They are of our lines (The Knights of Gloucester). The Veales possess a Merovingian lineage, as does any family marrying into them. They also trace back to Harding of Denmark and Eadnoth the Staller, steward to Edward the Confessor.

Anthony Martyn was the son of Edward s. of John, s. of Anthony, s. of Anthony, s. of John, s. of Richard, s. of William.

The Martyns held lands in Dorset and Devon and William’s widow resided in Clyst House. The merchant sons were in Exeter and London or at Athelhampton.

The Martyn lineage from William Martyn goes back then to William Martyn of Kemys (or Chemais) in Pembrokeshire and is fairly well known although often confused by Mormon genealogy. The Martyn family of the Southwest based in Devon is now quite extensive worldwide.

The division of Martyns at Athelhampton in Dorset came from the lineage of Nicholas Martyn s. of William Martyn. This lineage from the early Britons and the Desposyni also went to the line of the Spencers and thus is also found in Sir Winston Churchill, the Earls Spencer and Princess Diana and thus with Princes William and Harry.

The demarcation from the Martyns into the Welsh lines came from the grandparents of Nicholas Martyn. His father was Nicolas Martyn, son of William Martyn, son of Robert Fitz Martyn, son of Baron Martyn of Tours Lords of Kemys in Pembrokeshire. Martyn of Tours married Geva de Burci, d. of Serlo de Burci of the Norman conquests. She married again to a William of Falaise but most of the lands devolved on the son Robert FitzMartyn. From him Fitz Martyn became the surname of the line shortening to Martyn.

Nicholas’ wife was Maud De Brien(ne) daughter of Eve (Eva) De Tracy and Guy de Brien descendant of Jean de Brienne of Jerusalem and HRE m. Berengeria Infanta d. of Alphonse and Berengaria of Castile. Eve was the daughter of Henry de Tracy of Barnstaple in Devon.

The Martyn lines split into two main lines and then into extensive sub lines many of which were not properly recorded before the church records began in Devon.

The senior William Martyn married Angharad verch (or ferch) Rhys princess of Wales and from there we go back to the Ancient British.

The Welsh Connection

The line in Wales from Angharad (also Angarad) verch (d. of) Rhys Prince of South Wales and King of Deheubarth (b. ca. 1132 Ireland, d. 28 April 1197 at 65 years) is as follows below. From Rhys ap (son of) Gruffydd the entire Tudor dynasty sprung with a massive extension into England. This line was descended from Llywarch of Dyfed through Elen who married Hywel Dda ap Cadell, ap Rhodri Mawr (m. Angarad) (see Ashley M., ibid, p. 331; Ashley’s numbers and references have been retained to enable easy cross reference to the book and its biographical information).

The line through Hywel Dda is Rhys ap Griffith ap Rhys ap Tewder ap Cadell ap Einion, ap Owain, ap Hywel Dda (m. Elen verch Llywarch of Dyfed, see below) ap Cadell, ap Rhodri Mawr (m. Angharad verch Meurig). These two lines from the females are of importance also as Angharad was descended through her father Meurig from the sons of Cunedda through Ceredig (Ashley chart 4, p. 140).

Rhodri was the son of Merfyn ap Essyllt (m. Gwirad (Ashley NA8), ap Cynan ap Rhodri. Cynan also had a putative line across to the line of Caradog (Ashley ibid., ED 14) of the sons of Owain ap Einion and brother to Cadwallon ap Einion ap Cunedda.

The line to Cadwallon continued as Rhodri ap Idwal, ap Cadwaladr ap Cadwallon, ap Cadfan, ap Iago, ap Beli, ap Rhun, ap Maelgwyn, ap Cadwallon, ap Einion, ap Cunedda (ca 450s).

Cunedda had nine sons:

Tybion (whose line was of Mierionydd); Edern, Rhuton, Dunant (whose line was of Dunoding), Einion (whose line was of Gwynedd Rhos); Dogfael, Ceredig (whose line was Ceredigion); Osfael and Afloeg.

The offspring of Cunedda that ruled in Gwent and Glywysing are included in Ashley ibid, on p. 122. That chart includes rulers of Ergyng and Brittany.

Cunedda married Gwawl daughter of Coel Hen whose lines went to the Celts of the North as well as Wales and his line also passed to the line of Oswy of Northumbria in his marriage to Rhiainmelt d. of Rhoeth ap Rhun ap Urien ap Cinmarc ap Merchiaun ap Gurgust ap Ceneu ap Coel Hen.

Coel Hen married Ystradwal daughter of Cadafa ap Cynan ap Eudaf, who is descended from Coel ap Cadfan. It was Cadfan who married Gwladys d. of Lucius, ap Coel I. Coel married the daughter of Cyllin son of Caratacus (Caradog) who was captured by the Romans with his brother Arviragus and their families and taken to Rome. His son Linus the brother of Cyllin was one of the Seventy and the first bishop of Rome being appointed by the Apostle Paul. Much has been done to undermine this record by the Roman Church (see also the paper Origin of the Christian Church in Britain (No. 266)). The third son Guiderius is thought to have possibly been the Togidumnus killed by the Romans in the Southwest of Britain. Some assert that Coel Hen was of the tribe of the Brigantes, but if so he was a Magogite. The other and more likely assertion is that he was of the Votadini. John Morris asserts he was Dux Bellorum (War Duke) of Britain but according to Ashley this is not proven (ibid. p. 97).

Caratacus was the son of Cunobelin ap Tasciovanus.

Arviragus brother of Caratacus (which is his Romanised name) had a son named Meurig (called Marius by the Romans) who married the daughter of Prasutagus king of the Iceni and husband of Boudica (who led the revolt of the Iceni against the Romans after they had raped her and her daughter. She and the Iceni burnt Colchester, the then capital). Her line is putative from Antedios ap Addedormarusbut but is certain from their ancestors Mandubracius ap Imanuentus.

The line of Arviragus and Lucius ap Coel I is also descended from Bran the Blessed and extends also to another line of the British through Ceretic ap Cynloyp ap Cinhil ap Cursalem ap Fer ap Confer ap Cunedd to Coel son of Cadfan and Glwadys daughter of Lucius ap Coel I.

The line of Coel Hen (probably old King Cole of the nursery rhyme), who married Ystradwal of this line, was descended from Bran through his son Beli and his son Amalech (Avallach) through Amalech’s son Eudelen.

Gwawl daughter of Coel Hen married Cunedda who was also descended from Bran through Amalech as follows:

Cunedda ap Edern ap Paternus ap Tacit ap Cein ap Guocein ap Doli ap Guordoli ap Dyfwn ap Gurdumn ap Amgualoyt ap Angeurit ap Oumun ap Dyfwn ap Brithguein ap Eugein ap Amalech ap Beli ap Bran the Blessed ap Llyr (king Lear) (m. Penardun verch Llud ap Beli Mawr (ruling Britain ca 100 BCE)). King Lear (the character of Shakespeare) was the son of Caswallon ap Beli Mawr and thus Lear and Pernadun were cousins.

It was Arviragus chief of the Silurians that gave the twelve hides of land to the Church at the request of Joseph and his nephew Linus ap Caradog to build the church at Glastonbury. Thus my/our ancestors founded the church in Britain with Aristobulus bishop of Britain and also one of the Seventy with Linus. The daughter of Cyllin and the son of Meurig (Marius) son of Arviragus i. e. Coel I returned to Britain from Rome and established the church with their son Lucius and his son Cadfan (m. Gwladys).

The genealogical charts and maps of the Celtic tribes have been drawn up and are listed on the Abraham’s Legacy site.

Bran the Blessed is termed “the Blessed” because of his relationship and his marriage. He married Anna the daughter of Joseph of Aramathaea. Joseph was the uncle of the Virgin Mariam and the great uncle of Jesus Christ. He was a descendant of the Royal House of David and a member of the Sanhedrin and his lineage was understood to be that in Luke chapter 3.

It thus follows (no matter how much it is argued) that the descendants of Bran the Blessed in Britain are the Desposyni and are the Family of Christ and that is why so much effort was made after the synod of Whitby in 664 CE to destroy the records of the lines and discredit the understanding by the Roman Church both in Britain and in Europe. This was done by both the Roman Church and the Anglo-Saxons, and the Normans after them, for reasons of power and control of religion. However, the activities of Joseph are enshrined in the legends and songs of the ancient British.

Fortunately, as can be seen from these lineages they have now permeated virtually every one of the families of Britain. One would have to virtually exterminate every Anglo-Celt in the British Commonwealth and the USA to get rid of the family of Christ.

They would then have to start on France and Northern Germany to eliminate them. However, the Royal families of Europe have been penetrated by the lines of the Royal House of David. The Merovingians brought the line in and spread it throughout Europe. So also it extended in the “Fisher kings” of the Scandinavians and came in with the Norse.

The Merovingian line with its Davidic lineage was also brought to England in many forms and we can see that it also runs in the Veales of Cornwall and Gloucester as well as in the lines of the Plantagenets to Henry II and subsequently from above as do those of the Fisher kings above. These lines were also spread throughout Britain.

The Celts in Scotland

The kingdom of Strathclyde was formed from the line of Coel to Cynloyp and his son Ceretic. There was also a putative line to Tutagul (Ashley DA2).

Ceretic produced two lines, the major line being through Cinuit. The main line of Cinuit came through Dumnagual. His four sons were Clinoch (FB4) Cinbelin (DA 22) Garwynwyn and Inganach (m. Brychan) and their son lluan married Gabrhain and they married into and produced the Dal Riata Scots in Ireland from Ulster and in Scotland from the Irish connection (see below).

Thus the lineages of the British went to Ireland from Strathclyde and returned from Ireland to the British Celts and Scots in what is now Wales and England and Scotland.

Extension of the Celtic Church in Ireland

My Irish lineage is of the clan of Geohegan of Meath and Kings County from my mother Sylvia d. of William Padget son of John Thomas Padget m. Jane Geohegan d. of William Geohegan of Kiama, s. of Laurence Geohegan of Scarborough England great great-great grandson of Charles Geoghegan of Ireland direct descendant of Eohegan or “Little Horse”, 3^rd son of Neill of the Nine Hostages. The lineage is on the Abraham’s Legacy site at www.abrahams-legacy.org/geoghegans.html.

The lineage of Neill is important because at least 5% of the entire population of Ireland is directly descended from him, not to mention the Scots and many English families who are also descended from his ancestors as well. Thus an incredible number of Irish share this lineage and, as we will see, also a relationship to the House of David.

Neill was a warrior in Ireland who had a number of wives and concubines. He was declared High King in Ireland at Tara. He invaded Britain and renamed Alba as Scotland, after the Milesian ancestress Scota. The original Scota was a princess of the 18^th Ahmosid dynasty of Egypt and she, with her husband Niul and her son Gaodhal Glas (from whom the Gadelians are named), crossed the Red Sea with Moses in the Mixed Multitude. Niul had been given the land of Campus Cyrunt and the Pharaoh’s daughter’s hand in marriage because of his efforts in the Nubian wars in the South. Their loyalty to Israel saw them persecuted by Egypt and they had to leave the lands given to them by the preceding Pharaoh.

To return to Neill of the Nine Hostages, his family had established the Dal Riata Scots as we will see below.

After invading Britain, Neill then invaded Europe and was almost responsible for expelling the Romans from Gaul. He took 200 captives in chains to Ireland. He himself was later murdered by the son of the king of Leinster. One of the 200 slaves/prisoners was a man named Patrick of Tours, nephew or son of Martyn of Tours (accounts vary depending on denomination; the Martyn line of Devon above is also descended from this family in the Norman Conquest of 1066 with Baron Martyn of Tours). Patrick paid Neill back by converting his great-great grandson to the Christian Faith. That grandson was named (in the English) Columba. He became the great Sabbatarian Saint Columba of Iona and went on to consolidate the Christian Faith among the Irish Celts and Scots. He was the greatest Sabbatarian Churchman of the Celts. He went on to train those such as Aiden of Lindisfarne and the Sabbatarian Church was developed further through them, even though the councils saw the Celtic Church falter and virtually go underground after 664 CE at Whitby.

Neill had no idea that what he was doing would change Ireland forever. God used them all for a purpose. Columba got on with the Faith even though he no doubt would have been more powerful and wealthy with a sword in his hand, but not more lastingly famous. He prophesied his own death on the Sabbath.

The Milesian Ancestry of the Dal Riata Scots and of the O’Neills and of Dyfed

The kings of Dal Riata take their ancestry from the Milesian Fedlimid (T118).

The two major lines of his were of the sons Fiachu and Conn. The ancestral chart is at Ashley ibid., p. 194 (chart 8).

The line that married into the British and became the Welsh line is from Fiachu down to Elen who married Hywel Dda (EB15; EC23) (Ashley chart 17). The line of the Irish O’Neills and Geoghegans is from Conn and his son Art.

The line back from Elen is Elen v. Llywarch (EC21) of Dyfed (Brother of Rhodri (EC22) ap Hyfaidd (EC20) ap Tangwystyl (m. Bledri) ap Owain (EC18) (Brother of Rhain (EC17) father of Tryffin (EC19).

Their father was Maredudd (EC16) ap Tewdys (EC15) ap Rhain (EC14) ap Cadwgan (EC13) ap Cathen (EC12) ap Gwylyddien (EC11) ap Nowy (EC10) ap Arthwyr (EC9) ap Pedr (EC8) ap Cyngar (EC7) ap Vortepor (EC6) ap Aircol (EC5) ap Tryffin (EC4) ap Aed (EC3) ap Corath (EC2) ap Eochaid (EC1) ap Artchorp ap Angus ap Fiachu ap Fedlimid (T118).

Fedlimid of Ireland’s other son Conn (T120) produced the lines of Art (T122) and Saraid who married Conair (T122) ap Moglama.

The descendants of Saraid and Conair were Corbred (Q40) f. of Eochaid (T126) f. of Athirco (Q829), Findacher (Q831), Thrinkind (Q834?) Romaich (Q836), Angus (Q837) f. of Eochaid, f. of Erc who was the father of Loarn, Fergus (FC1) and Angus.

Loarn was father of Muirdach and Fergus was father of Domangart. From these two the Dal Riata Scots were descended (see Ashley Charts 8 & 9, pp. 194 and 195).

The importance of this lineage from Fedlimid was that the prophet Jeremiah had taken the throne princess from Judah and placed the lineage in Ireland amongst the Tuatha de Danaan. When the Milesians invaded and came to rule in Ireland this line also passed into the Milesian kings and thus, from our ancestor Fedlimid, the Davidic lineage spread not just into the Dal Riata Scots but also into the houses of Dyfed. From there it went into Wales and hence the lineages above. Also it went into Northumbria. It also went into the O’Neill’s and into the Geoghegans (and the Higgins and the other families descended from Niall). These lineages were through the line of Art (T122) ap Conn. Art was the brother of Saraid, ancestress of the Dal Riata (this aspect will be examined in more detail in the paper at part D, Jeremiah and the House of David (No. 67D)).

The Tuatha De Danaan also, as a group of people, moved in large numbers into Britain and in their lines also brought the early lineages of the House of David over among their Haplogroup I Israelites who intermarried with the British Celts in significant numbers and then into the Anglo-Saxons. This union is the basis of the union of Ephraim and Dan in prophecy as the new Joseph (see the paper Genetic Origin of the Nations (No. 265)).

The lineage from Art ap Conn ap Fedlimid was Cormac Mac Art (T125) to his sons Cairbre (T127) to Fiacha (T128) to Muirdach (T130) to Eochaid (T132) to Niall (T134).

Three of Neill’s sons were Loeguire (T136) (father of Crimthan) and also Eogan and Conall. Eogan was father of Murtagh by Erc daughter of Loarn of the Dal Riata. She also had a son by Conall ap Niell and their son Fedlimid was the father of Colum Cille or St Columba of Iona who was cousin to the Geoghegan and O’Neill lines.

The Lion of Judah is featured on the shield of the Geoghegans and is a Red lion with Geoghegan but the lion appears as a Blue and also a Green Lion on other Milesian Clans. The arms of Geoghegan is a shield argent (silver) with a lion rampant gules (red) and three red hands (of Ulster) one in each of the corners of the shield.

Murtagh ap Muirdach ap Eogan was father to Domnal (T142) from whom the O’Neill kings of Ireland were descended. He also fathered Baetan (T145) whom, through his granddaughter Fina verch Colman (T151) passed the lineages into Northumbria by marriage to Oswy (L16) (see Ashley chart 15).

Thus the link went from the British Celts in Strathclyde to Ireland and back again as a double link from Ireland into Scotland and Wales as well as Northumbria and on into England generally.

The Davidic lineages are all over the British Isles and throughout the Commonwealth and the USA in a multitude of families who all take their names from one or more of these ancestors. The lines came in from five (and in fact six) directions as we can see from above.

The traditional old and imperfectly described route was via Jeremiah and the throne princess daughter of Zedekiah to Ireland and from thence to Scotland, England and Wales. Thus the overturning was in three directions not just in a sequence of three as explained by the “British Israelites” as we will see from Part D.

The second method was via the Desposyni and the family of Christ from the marriage of Bran the Blessed to Anna daughter of Joseph of Aramathaea. This avenue became very widespread and much has been done to discredit it. This line established Christianity in Britain and Northern Gaul.

The third avenue was via the French lineages from the Merovingians who also trace the lineage back to Antenor I king of the Cimmerians ca 500 BCE. These are the vestiges of the Wilusian Hittites from Troy also, hence Cymry or Cimmerians. They had deliberately introduced the Davidic Line through arranged intermarriage.

The fourth entry was via the Israelites of the Northern tribes who had intermingled with the Anglo-Saxons in Parthia and came in under Odin and intermingled with the original British who were both Riphathian and Magogite Celts as were the Anglo-Saxons themselves. The distinctions are in the YDNA haplogroups but intermarriage has destroyed any separation of people completely.

The fifth method was through the entry of the Sephardic Jews into Britain from the beginning and from their intermarriage especially after the persecutions of 1205.

Our family has all five (plus) links.

The House of David is extensive throughout the British Commonwealth and the USA and much of it is through the female lineages. It is all pervasive and impossible to now differentiate except by isolating the YDNA but that cannot eradicate the fact of the mtDNA cross-breeding also. The YDNA lines in Judah show a Hittite Celt ancestor but that cannot alter the fact of massive Davidic interbreeding.

The message is that salvation is now of the Gentiles and will continue en masse.